As a general rule, judging other womyn’s feminisms is a practice I try to avoid. I generally try to think ‘as long as they are resisting in some way that makes sense to them, that’s awesome.’ Taking one look at someone’s activism/resistance and saying “that’s so not feminist” not only makes you a snobby elitist, but probably also outs yourself as a ignorant, close-minded jerk.
But I’m going to have to call worst feminist ever on this one.
Perusing online news pages, I came across this story in the Welland Tribune.
http://www.wellandtribune.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2435564#
This is the story of young local punk band called “Sexual Assault.” They used the image of a headless woman with her legs spread, sporting the band’s name between her legs to promote themselves.
True story.
How they did not see the criticism coming, I have no idea. But their defense is equally as puzzling… and about as intellectually stimulating as watching an episode of The Hills. (And I would know…)
They claim they’re trying to “push the envelope” (quote: “Sexual Assault band member Alex Andrews said he can appreciate that some people might not like his group’s name. But it’s meant to be provocative, he said.”) and punk rock is all about shocking people (quote: “’There’s been bands for 30 years now who have had offensive names. I think the idea of punk is to try and break the taboos, right? To be out there and offensive, so to speak. That’s the whole image of punk.’”).
You know, the usual diatribes. But this time I’m not buying it.
Other than being offensive and triggering to survivors of sexual assault, the flyer is just plain uninspired. Excuse me, but what’s so fresh and edgy about using a sexualized woman to sell something?
…
Oh, nothing?
…
That’s what I thought. I mean, really? Really?! That’s you pushing the envelope?? This is no more original than ads I see in the dentist office selling jeans. I think they were onto this in the 1960s, guys and gals. Nice try though.
Sure, being provocative does usually mean offending someone, somewhere. And yes, using “sexual assault” as a band name does completely trivialize the concept in a way that is utterly and totally offensive (“’At the same time, it’s just a band, and it’s just a band name,’ Andrews said. ‘It’s not at all that big of an issue as far as I’m concerned.’” - Oh hello, offensive). But, I mean, this isn’t even a “fresh” take on the concept of sexual assault. Women being sexually assaulted is not new, and I hardly think this is breaking a taboo. WE TALK ABOUT WOMEN AND SEXUAL ASSAULT ALL THE TIME. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?!
And this is the part that really gets me.
Oh yes, it gets worse.
The poster was designed by a young woman… who claims to be all about female empowerment.
Poster designer, Justine Moore, 19, said she had empowering women in mind when she drew the explicit image of the shapely woman. Moore said Sexual Assault was just the name of her friend’s band and she didn’t make the link to violence against women.
“I love drawing women and I think they’re beautiful,” said Moore, a St. Catharines resident, adding she wanted a reaction but didn’t mean to hurt victims of assault.
“It usually revolves around sexy confident women who are in charge of their sexuality.”
Didn’t make the link to violence against women?
It revolves around sexy, confident women who are in charge of their sexuality??
If you ask me, the woman’s input is an obvious and desperate jab at justifying this lame-ass attempt at provocative art. This angle, this “see, she’s a woman and she wasn’t offended, that means it’s not offensive!” bit is just unconvincing. It just means she doesn’t know what she’s talking about.
It’s hard to imagine anyone thinking that being sexually assaulted is synonymous with being in charge of your sexuality.
Further, I think we can all agree that sexual assault has nothing to do with sexuality. Let’s not try and make sexual assault sexy, okay? That is just way too fucked up.
And, she didn’t make the link between sexual assault and violence against women? While she was drawing a sexy woman’s body with the words “sexual assault” nestled in her crotch? *facepalm*
Okay, so maybe she didn’t out-and-out say she’s a feminist, but she said she was trying to empower women. Um, fail.
I also enjoy how one of the band members tried to shirk responsibility for the whole mess because he wasn’t involved in designing the poster. Oh sure, blame the woman.
There are so many ways that this could actually have challenged norms and made people think in new ways about sexual assault. Let me pitch you some ideas.
How about flipping genders? Make men the focus of sexual assault for once. Talking about male victims of sexual violence is certainly more taboo than talking about women as victims (and a completely legit reality). Creating dialogue around men and sexual assault would shed light on a whole new aspect of sexual assault that doesn’t get nearly as much attention as it should.
What about still using a woman’s body, but positioning it in a strong and assertive way that doesn’t imply victimization? How about imply, oh what was the term, taking charge of your sexuality? Let’s see some vigil ante women standing up against sexual assault! I feel fairly certain that vigil antes are punk as fuck.
But please, whatever you do, DO NOT try and make sexual assault sexy. You freakin’ idiots.